Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Rule following, philosophy: is an expression for a problem that L. Wittgenstein formulated by excluding that a person could follow a rule that applies only to them as an individual. See also private language, rules, feelings, meaning, beetle example._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Michael Esfeld on Rule Following - Dictionary of Arguments
I 102 ~ Rule Following/Wittgenstein: to believe to follow a rule is not following. Therefore, one cannot follow a rule privately because otherwise mere belief would be the same as following. >Rule following/Wittgenstein, >Kripke's Wittgenstein. I 156ff Normativity Problem/Kripke's Wittgenstein: how can one detect whether the continuation of the series is correct? Causality is not enough: moved problem: what is the proper causality. "Real essence" (microstructure): which is the right essence? Aristotle: natural form: how do we recognize the natural form? >Causality, >Microstructure, >Nature/Aristotle._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Es I M. Esfeld Holismus Frankfurt/M 2002 |
||
> Counter arguments against Esfeld
> Counter arguments in relation to Rule Following
